And this is why a national agreement is so hard to cover all types of routes. My rt is typically about 14000 dps a week. My flats are less but still 3 tubs and 2-3 feet unless business catalogs come in. We get tub loads of eddm daily. But, I'm small miles in a central city business area. I admire the ones who still have gravel and mud bogs on a daily basis.
Our routes are roughly similar in our offices, I believe.
I still believe that our current evaluation system is basically acceptable, but it needs some tweaks to cover all types of routes fairly. The other part needed is the ability of management OR carrier to have route re-evaluated IF there's a shift of more than say 20%. I've written extensively previously as to how I'd propose the specifics, and I'm fully confident, as a route counter, one who's assisted realignment in several offices, that it could work fairly. I understand the calculations and how they're applied. It CAN work.
Disclosing previous private sector realignments I've been part of, I am fully confident I could fix it. Would I ever get the chance? Never. Would I ever even get the chance to give credible input? NO, nobody is interested in really listening, they have their agenda and all of US are simply going to do whatever arrives in the contract. I'm blowing hot air here. Whatever happens there will be zero consideration for what the actual workers want.
The REAL problem is that those who are under, or on, don't want evaluation as they're worried they'll lose. Those who are over crave evaluation, so they're no longer working for free. Right or wrong, each group is operating in their own self interest, even if fairly. A fair evaluation system (our current one, with some changes) would give all types of routes the ability to work on AVERAGE at or below evaluation. The way this REMAINS fair is the ability of management OR carrier to re-evaluate for major changes. Since these evaluations come at any time during the year, it would be tough for operations to withhold mail during the period, as it would be different for everyone.
Going hourly would surely be an hours work for an hours pay. The sacrifice we'd make for that, when it could be done through salaried evaluation, in my view, is too much. I see the supervisors walking the city side yelling "hurry up, get out of here, you're five minutes late" and "what do you mean that swing is 45 minutes it was 30 minutes yesterday" where every part of our work would be open to examination, evaluation daily, with MORE involvement with supervisors we surely don't want. I personally have no interest in taking everything to the street, nor do I want to carry and case parts of other routes. I'm done with specifics, but I've worked city in several offices and it's surely not for me. The city carriers in our offices actually would PREFER to be rural carriers. Enough said, I'll already get a dozen responses as to why I'm full of horse crap.