• Please keep questions in the Questions forum to contract, procedures, and requests for documentation. Vehicle, TSP, retirement, etc questions please post in the regular forums. Thank you
  • Everyone, please help make our jobs easier and choose the correct category. Thank you

Cheating carriers and dissolving routes.

Status
Not open for further replies.

BluesClues

Well-known member
I'm in an office where all routes are losing hours after each MMS. Here's my question.. there are two routes that eventually should go aux before mine but these carriers are cheating the system by taking every package/scan to the door and put in boxholders in RRECS that clearly aren't. My dilemma; I take integrity seriously and don't do anything these other carriers are doing, how can I prevent my route from going aux before them, without cheating the system? The Postmaster doesn't seem interested to look into the cheating that is going on. Am I screwed? You'd think the PO would value a carrier with integrity but I guess that's wishful thinking..
 
Solution
Parcels to door is not cheating it’s getting paid for the work you are doing. Boxholder wss is a different story, and believe it or not management will be questioned eventually.

Morale imo worry about yourself and what you are doing. Getting involved with integrity etc of other carriers never ends well for anyone involved.
Parcels to door is not cheating it’s getting paid for the work you are doing. Boxholder wss is a different story, and believe it or not management will be questioned eventually.

Morale imo worry about yourself and what you are doing. Getting involved with integrity etc of other carriers never ends well for anyone involved.
 
Solution
It's not in the PM best interest to lose routes. Less full time routes equals smaller office, smaller budget, less ability to staff, and less clerk hours...which means PM has to do more on their 40hr salary.

And it's not in the NRLCAs best interest to help get routes smaller.

This is a fight where you don't win.
 
I'm in an office where all routes are losing hours after each MMS. Here's my question.. there are two routes that eventually should go aux before mine but these carriers are cheating the system by taking every package/scan to the door and put in boxholders in RRECS that clearly aren't. My dilemma; I take integrity seriously and don't do anything these other carriers are doing, how can I prevent my route from going aux before them, without cheating the system? The Postmaster doesn't seem interested to look into the cheating that is going on. Am I screwed? You'd think the PO would value a carrier with integrity but I guess that's wishful thinking..

Your last sentence is the answer and 2 words that don't belong to together. Post office & Integrity.

Where's my website/database to see my numbers I was promised????? NONE.

Why am I only getting flats only twice a week> COVERAGE FACTOR

RRECS isn't about integrity, it is more about screwing carriers over because all of sudden your coverage can be like mine and just continuous fall somehow EVERY SINGLE COUNT!

Started 93% down to 85% curb and 77% CBU. Cost me an hour if not more. YET I have no proof I am delivering that much less or delivering more.
 
My question to you is: Who cheated first?
Are you sure that you’re or those carriers that you mentioned, are getting proper credit for everything that you do?
I say that I know that none of us are. Here’s a method to make sure that you are getting proper credit for your % coverage, by the way, you aren’t.
The next time you have a box holder that is to be delivered, deliver it as usual, but ask you pm if it’s ok if you enter it “delivered” the next day.
By doing this, on your Radar report, which should return in 3-5 days, you SHOULD see the day that you delivered the box holder come back as a 100% day and the next day that you entered the box holder come back as a 100% day. You will only see the day you delivered the box holder correctly show 100% coverage. This proves that you and all rural carriers are being cheated daily. Depending on your average number of stops recorded from informed delivery as to how much we are getting cheated, because the Usps has illegally reprogrammed Rrecs to only allow % coverage for informed delivery and NOT consider the bread crumbs when determining how many stops we are making.
I’m also guessing that none of the routes in your office have ever been properly mapped, where each carrier sat down and went through box by box determining and recording where each stop, parking area ( for parcel delivery), and where each door delivery actually is. These things will CHEAT carriers out of a great deal of evaluation hours and thereby money.
Therefore is it morally ok to “cheat” to get some of that $ back???
I say not only ok, I believe it is justified. I do understand that there are carriers, like you that would like to take the high road, so here’s another, legally justified method that is in our contract for offices like yours to gain back 4-6 hours per week of evaluation pay.
You can and should ask for a DPS QUANTITY REVIEW.
Read up on what these entail and ask for one to start asap. You and everyone who starts one will win, because the plants no longer do there jobs properly and put all letters into be run in the DPS machines. They don’t want to work hard and any folded letters are put through our flat machines, that pays us as if those pieces are flats, (good for us), but they ARE letters and should be in our DPS. Therefore we should count them as letters in a DPS review and always win because those pieces were NOT counted as letters during our last mini count. Do this, and in 30 days you’ll be back paid with the gained hours and your route will be re-evaluated to a higher level until the next mini count. Where you can immediately start another review over again and do the same thing. Glitch in the system? Yes, and one where any carrier can add back hours to their routes.
Until the Usps starts charging mailers properly , (which they won’t) those folded booklets/letters will be charged as if they are machinable, but not placed into our DPS and cause our % coverage to be lower.
 
I'm in an office where all routes are losing hours after each MMS. Here's my question.. there are two routes that eventually should go aux before mine but these carriers are cheating the system by taking every package/scan to the door and put in boxholders in RRECS that clearly aren't. My dilemma; I take integrity seriously and don't do anything these other carriers are doing, how can I prevent my route from going aux before them, without cheating the system? The Postmaster doesn't seem interested to look into the cheating that is going on. Am I screwed? You'd think the PO would value a carrier with integrity but I guess that's wishful thinking..
There is no integrity credit in RRECS. The union didn't deem it necessary ;)
 
There is no integrity credit in RRECS. The union didn't deem it necessary ;)

Yes there are things happening with RRECS that are making zero sense.

Perfect example

Old office I worked in has an intermediate route. It had 3 boxholders a week at start of RRECS. 425 boxes roughly. Started at 43k. Amazon office. Lost all 3 boxholders with minimal boxes added and YET somehow has went up to 45k.

Another intermediate route. Started 43k. Lost only boxholder right after 1st count. 330 boxes roughly. 1st 3 count 43k same time almost. This past count 46k.
 
Yes there are things happening with RRECS that are making zero sense.

Perfect example

Old office I worked in has an intermediate route. It had 3 boxholders a week at start of RRECS. 425 boxes roughly. Started at 43k. Amazon office. Lost all 3 boxholders with minimal boxes added and YET somehow has went up to 45k.

Another intermediate route. Started 43k. Lost only boxholder right after 1st count. 330 boxes roughly. 1st 3 count 43k same time almost. This past count 46k.
I have 580 (all curbside) and I'm BARELY a 41K.
5 minutes from a 40K at this point.
Boxholders out the a$$. 90% coverage. Only avg about 100 pkgs daily (Amazon delivers here).
This route was a 46K before RRECS. 😏

I'm probably the most educated in RRECS of my entire office and don't know what else to do at this point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top