I always advocated for subs working hourly . No evaluation . But the strange part is most of the subs don’t want it . Because most of them working actually like 35 hrs but getting paid 48hrs for most of the week if the year . Can’t win both way I guess . Have to choose your way
I am a sub, with 20 fellow RCAs and 6 PTFs in my office. We do have it both ways, but no one knows anything about it. Trainers, regs, and subs especially; it's too complicated for the newer ones before they quit. The thought to work 35 and get paid 48 is fantastic. But the ability is hardly there. Brand new, we are hourly for 6 months unless we work a route consecutive days and below eval. Also if I work 40.001 than that 48 eval changes to 40.001 hourly, with OT threshold starting at 40 for us.
Two examples: Worked my 43k primary 4 days and a secondary my 5th day. Worked under eval on all enough they sent me back out under green card to assist other RCAs. I got the evals and an additional 9 hours of normal pay because i tracked my time to 39.8 hpurs that week. Stressful as hell.
I took over a hold down and regularly work over 40, so evaluation (42k) does not affect me. They stopped asking me first for additional routes because i was taking so long on this route, though it comes up some days. I work past 40 it all pays the same, no eval to keep up with and juggle to stretch below 40.
I don't think that either of us can speak for "MOST SUBS".
Certainly the shortage of subs and the 50 mile mandate have made many subs essentially fulltime workers or indentured servants, but I don't think that is universal, nor is the wishes of some an excuse for the union continuing to allow subs to be forced to volunteer time working overburdened routes. It is shameful this is not addressed. Didn't the union at one time set up a working committee or some such nonsense to address RCA retention? Do they (The Union) even know this occurs?
Tackling most subs is hard, but i think i have a larger group than most to compare with. Despite the contingent i listed, i have seen an additional 60 attrited out through the 1 year i have been here. The overall i get from everyone, quitters included:
1. The majority simply did not understand what the job is or asks. Load our own trucks, dismount like Fedex, organize mail? No skills are translatable and the overwhelmed leave. There is no training foR the job, Academy was Union and they showed nothing i needed except ubbm and the daily scan inputs. 4 of 5 days wasted. My OJT was with a PTF, so he educated on process, not the route. That has helped me more than everything else. The limited run we had of PTFs training worked better then regs training comparing all the ones who i have seen retain troubles when going from route to route.
We've swung both ways.
2. Pay is not enough to compensate a single workday a week. So we cross-crafts regularly, they get grievances, and our Union ADR responds with "You're getting hours, why you complaining?" On-call pay so that they stay ready to come in would be a decent answer, but despite our Union ADR nodding along to us being on-call we are not paid as such. Thus the inverse occurs:
3. Work is too much for 80 hours a week. Getting a reliable balance is impossible if we cant get a schedule made that accounts for 5-10 regs calling out. So we split multiple routes daily and stay out for 12 hours or more if the closer forgets us and we forget the time. We are not educated on a 12-hour limit because it never happens to a reg, so they never inform us.
4. Pay (again) is not leading in our area for the labor we do. Mcdonald's pays the same as an RCA, just lose out of benefits. But those benefits are taking money away from a check that already does not cover our $500 grocery, $1600 rent, $450 car payment, and so on. $817 a week during this inflationary crisis for anyone not retiring INTO this job is silly, not to mention the above "if 40" problem again. Before anyone says to "get another job", many of that 60 that quit have assuredly done so, but the objective is getting people to stay, no?
5. Treatment of management is a problem for many as well. I know I am favored or feared by them so I don't personally see actions against me I don't take advantage of, but them going around and picking up someone to dump things on is terrible. We can't take everything coming down, it's not our fault everytime something goes wrong and something doesn't scan or get mis-delivered. And your KPIs are not my problem, they are district's or someone's for not giving you the means to reach it. Track your own problems before they occur and pro-actively fix them!
6. Lastly the quality of people walking in are terrible. I know 2 RCAs i would not miss if they disappeared. The regs hate their RCAs district-wide according to our Union ADR. I go assist a particular RCA, i need to take 70% of their route so we can finish at the same time and on time. The good rise to the top of names and we all get to know each other by virtue of "ive seen you at the office but I've never driven out to help you" and the bad are single word curses we utter to each other as warnings to mentally prepare. We get people to stick around only to realize they are less than half a person, forces us to work that little extra right at the moment we thought the day was over and start to relax. This spirals to that 80 overwork period for people who are competent and decide to leave anyways.
Excuse the rant, and Union has said they wanted something for new hires but there are no details and i have no trust or faith in their process. Least with management you can track them and their reasons even if they fail it.