• Please keep questions in the Questions forum to contract, procedures, and requests for documentation. Vehicle, TSP, retirement, etc questions please post in the regular forums. Thank you
  • Everyone, please help make our jobs easier and choose the correct category. Thank you

Question about regular pay.

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is a listing in my office that I am about to bid on. Only thing I don't get is that it is listed as having a 48hr eval, but when I was taken off back in June, the daily eval was only around 8.5 hours. Wouldn't it have to be a 9.5-9.6 hour daily eval to be a 48?

Am I misunderstanding something here? I don't want to bid on this route thinking it's paying 48 hours a week, only to find out that it's really 43 or so.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot at 2024-12-13 17-51-40.png
    Screenshot at 2024-12-13 17-51-40.png
    12.6 KB · Views: 25
Last edited:
Solution
This is a listing in my office that I am about to bid on. Only thing I don't get is that it is listed as having a 48hr eval, but when I was taken off back in June, the daily eval was only around 8.5 hours. Wouldn't it have to be a 9.5-9.6 hour daily eval to be a 48?

Am I misunderstanding something here? I don't want to bid on this route thinking it's paying 48 hours a week, only to find out that it's really 43 or so.
Did you try asking the PM to print out from the system what the route shows? It's being carried now and someone is getting compensated for it at a certain rate.
Did it increase dramatically at last MMS in October? Yes, it would be 9.6 daily.
No. It increased a little between October and February, from about 8.2 to 8.5 when I left in the beginning of June. They have every route down as 48 hour eval.

There's another route in the office that went down from 8.4 to 8.2 in October from the regular not taking rrecs seriously. It was 8.3 or 8.4 in June, and it's a 48 on the list as well.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot at 2024-12-13 18-45-51.png
    Screenshot at 2024-12-13 18-45-51.png
    12.9 KB · Views: 5
This was my immediate thought but seeing that they ALL are listed as 48's, it seems suspiciously like another manglement mess-up??
I had a bad feeling , which is all too normal, when this recent MOU was composed. I strongly suspected much, if not all , of the paperwork on a given route(s) would not match. Form 50, 4240, what's ACTUALLY in the system, bid notices , pay checks, etc.
 
This is a listing in my office that I am about to bid on. Only thing I don't get is that it is listed as having a 48hr eval, but when I was taken off back in June, the daily eval was only around 8.5 hours. Wouldn't it have to be a 9.5-9.6 hour daily eval to be a 48?

Am I misunderstanding something here? I don't want to bid on this route thinking it's paying 48 hours a week, only to find out that it's really 43 or so.
Did you try asking the PM to print out from the system what the route shows? It's being carried now and someone is getting compensated for it at a certain rate.
 
Solution
We have a sorry HR dept that operates the ebidding site. They just list the evaluated hrs for routes, which may not even be current, and don’t think it’s necessary to denote whether H, J, or K routes. The best thing to do is have management pull up the current 4240 on any route you plan to bid on and it should show the correct paid hrs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top