PandaSharks
Well-known member
Today we had a stand-up and were required to watch a video outlining what is and isn’t allowed during load time and end-of-shift (EOS) duties. During the discussion, our OIC mentioned a conference call where it was stated that several rural carriers nationwide made close to $250,000 in a year.
I’m genuinely trying to understand how that would be possible. A maxed-out 48K route at Step 15 pays $100,053 annually. To more than double that, a carrier would have to be running multiple routes and working six days a week, essentially year-round. Both the math and the physical demands of that kind of workload don’t seem realistic to me.
I'm not saying district and about is lying but if this is true then props to those carriers. But if those numbers are accurate, it would only be possible because management allowed extreme and sustained route stacking or coverage. That's on management not the carrier.
I’m genuinely trying to understand how that would be possible. A maxed-out 48K route at Step 15 pays $100,053 annually. To more than double that, a carrier would have to be running multiple routes and working six days a week, essentially year-round. Both the math and the physical demands of that kind of workload don’t seem realistic to me.
I'm not saying district and about is lying but if this is true then props to those carriers. But if those numbers are accurate, it would only be possible because management allowed extreme and sustained route stacking or coverage. That's on management not the carrier.