Amazon explores cutting ties with USPS, building its own delivery network
- Thread starter Ruralinfo
- Start date
Good riddance. Maybe my knees, elbows, and wrists from constantly getting in and out of my POV can start to recover. Money isn't everything, especially when your body pays for it. Amazon can take there weight benches, treadmills, and barbie dream homes and shove them.Amazon has long been the Postal Service’s top customer, providing more than $6 billion in annual revenue to the agency in 2025. Amazon is preparing to expand its nationwide delivery network and give up its long-standing partnership with the U.S. Postal Service, according to three people with knowledge of the matter, a move that could […]
Amazon explores cutting ties with USPS, building its own delivery network - Ruralinfo.net
Amazon has long been the Postal Service’s top customer, providing more than $6 billion in annual revenue to the agency in 2025. Amazon is preparing to expand…www.ruralinfo.net
Voglio-il mio
Well-known member
And since RRECS has kicked in they are no longer a free service by the Rural Carriers to the USPS.Amazon pays 6 Billion for deliveries that cost to the USPS 9 or 10 Billion to make... there's a reason UPS and FedEx have pulled back from Amazon....
DB.Cooper
Well-known member
I've wondered if that was one reason USPS was trying to charge AMAZON more.... Some of our box holders that were once weekly, disappeared after RRECS came in... I remember the old mail counts where we wouldn't get the box holders, and all the UPS and FedEx drops would stop.... harder now for them to avoid as many things...
RollinRural
Well-known member
Highest IQ statement of the day
Good riddance to amazon
The more Amazon parcels that usps got, the more money they lost.
With RRECS it appears the PO is cheating carriers in a different way, at least, according to what ppl say on here & most likely on reddit etc…I've wondered if that was one reason USPS was trying to charge AMAZON more.... Some of our box holders that were once weekly, disappeared after RRECS came in... I remember the old mail counts where we wouldn't get the box holders, and all the UPS and FedEx drops would stop.... harder now for them to avoid as many things...
DB.Cooper
Well-known member
They say a leopard can't change their spots, a zebra or tiger can't change their stripes... Likewise the liar cheater USPS can't change their lying cheating ways.... well, they can change the way they do it, but they have to do it in some way.... RRECS Is just a new and improved cheating shell game they've invented....
Shannonboy
Well-known member
Best Comment of the Night right there. Well said good buddy...They say a leopard can't change their spots, a zebra or tiger can't change their stripes... Likewise the liar cheater USPS can't change their lying cheating ways.... well, they can change the way they do it, but they have to do it in some way.... RRECS Is just a new and improved cheating shell game they've invented....
damifiknow
Well-known member
db.cooper use it to your advantage, and put it to themback. its not rocket science if you read the contract and do what helps you , i at first went down 40 minutes since then have gone up 40 minutes from where i started. but i agree they are using it against us.
DB.Cooper
Well-known member
Sad thing is, as always, when they screw carriers with RRECS or anything else, they act like that's as it should be... when the carriers use the system to come out ahead, they act like it's some sort of criminal activity that must be eliminated...
If we find a company to coordinate Amazon competitors packages, how much could we recover from the loss of Amazon.
We built a business plan that depends on one customer for our survival. I think this is a poor decision. It means we must act as if we are part of Amazon. Is there another way in which we may be smaller but be more effective?
We built a business plan that depends on one customer for our survival. I think this is a poor decision. It means we must act as if we are part of Amazon. Is there another way in which we may be smaller but be more effective?
