Rural-life-0323
Active member
OK something definitely changed months back. What is causing routes with multi-unit dwellings (apartments/condos/town-homes) to not get EDDM mailings? It's one thing that a route which is entirely apartments and businesses not get them, but we're noticing that routes that have single family homes and also one apartment mixed in are getting EDDM for everything other than their apartments.
Has there been some type of exclusion made?
USPS policy change?
Are we doing something wrong in our edit books?
I can't find anything online at all that suggests USPS made some kind of changes last year and am wondering if anyone knows or is seeing this, too. This has been going on for at least 6-9 months. The EDDM cost comes to mind for the all apartment route being the most expensive in the office with the most addresses, however if someone pays for another route with one apartment in it, and that one apartment is excluded but everyone else gets it, are they paying the same price and being cheated or a lower price? Something is certainly rotten in the state of Denmark.
Has there been some type of exclusion made?
USPS policy change?
Are we doing something wrong in our edit books?
I can't find anything online at all that suggests USPS made some kind of changes last year and am wondering if anyone knows or is seeing this, too. This has been going on for at least 6-9 months. The EDDM cost comes to mind for the all apartment route being the most expensive in the office with the most addresses, however if someone pays for another route with one apartment in it, and that one apartment is excluded but everyone else gets it, are they paying the same price and being cheated or a lower price? Something is certainly rotten in the state of Denmark.
