I have eval of 8ish And working a 9ish or 10ish currently. I increased my daily time without paying you 
I’ve never heard of a route paying 9.5 which would be a 47.5K. If you were in my district you would be cut to 8.6 and frozen for a year if over 9.2 so what good would it do? Be careful with aggressive scanner action it can burn you.
It is not hard if you have the volume and a route that pairs well with rrecs. Rrecs strictly favors to door actions via parcels, authorized dismounts, package pick ups the likes. Learning to be safe while on load and EoS, while doing every action you can. Keeping up on edit book, mapping, webez is absolutely crucial. Rrecs does not pair well with routes without many to door actions.
What is webez? I have never heard of that term associated with my job.
It is the online version of our edit book. It cuts out having to send edit books to get done by district for most changes. Management are required in my area to know it and make changes we ask for. Means no longer waiting days or weeks to get new addresses added. I still send edit book monthly, verify ams did the job they were supposed to. If not I ask to have webez checked daily till they do. It’s amazing how quickly things get done when you become a thorn
. FYI every request creates a paper trail via email.that's the ironic thing about the union, they spout how these new engineering standards are the best...and in the next breath, point out how incorrect the data collection really is. it's like they have a split personality.How can they hard core push this with step 4's arguing the opposite?
That's funny.
I think it’s called flip flopping or at best riding the fence. Pick a side…is you is or is you ain’t my advocate?
Data integrity (accurate numbers for every facet of evalution) is an issue that can't be solved. The investment it requires to establish an accurate database that's accessible and viewable to different disciplines (craft/union, executive, manufacturing, logistics etc) is far beyond anything that could be purchased and installed due to cost. The Post Office has neglected data and sources for decades and the catch up is beyond their reach.
In today's world, my view is our union is given a percentage reduction in costs, and the union truly tries to find the least impactful way to spread that pain. Since they have no leverage (cannot strike) they pretty much have to do what PMG and staff dictates. They can make their case but they must accept the final decision.
I along with two other carriers at my office filled out the two week coverage factor worksheet. On average the coverage factor percentage was off by about 5% for my route. This means my route is missing about 6 daily minutes (36 minutes a week).Data integrity (accurate numbers for every facet of evalution) is an issue that can't be solved. The investment it requires to establish an accurate database that's accessible and viewable to different disciplines (craft/union, executive, manufacturing, logistics etc) is far beyond anything that could be purchased and installed due to cost. The Post Office has neglected data and sources for decades and the catch up is beyond their reach.
Maybe the best "solution" is to expand the 19% to 99%
Load time, end of shift time and parcels to the door are about the only things you can do to help your self out. Also, do not forget any boxholder or wss mailings.
