• Everyone, please help make our jobs easier and choose the correct category. Thank you

NRLCA is corrupt to the core

Forcedout

New member
So after 10 months of fighting for my backpay for my misposted route, the NRLCA denied my appeal for arbitration. They are really trying their best to cover up this RRECS mistake. They continued to deny any wrongdoing, but are finally agreeing to pay me the wages they owe me. Funny, I'm being paid all the way back to the day I started, so somehow my route is now officially rated at a 48K overburdened. It wasn't misposted though, the day I started it just happened to change from a 43K to 48K overburdened.

Even though they agreed to pay me and split the route in their unilateral settlement, they still refuse to split the route, saying they simply don't have the workers. Nope, instead of splitting my route, they are now forcing me and some others to work one of our days off every other week. So not only do they ignore unilateral settlements, but they double down and punish us more. The day I came back from using vacation time to fight this, they had left a weeks worth of mail at my station that somehow didn't get delivered. I refused to deliver it, don't know who did, but really?? That's just petty.

Well, gee how about instead of stealing money from us through RRECS, overworking us, lying about all the issues and mistakes, manipulating mail count to take even more and increase our workloads, you actually follow contract, agreements, stop treating us as disposable and pay a living wage? These changes may actually get people to want to work here.

USPS and NRLCA still deny any wrongdoing, but unilaterally made all decisions without informing me and denying my information requests while they conspired together to cover up this mistake. I have 3 signatures from the same supervisor that are completely different during this process, one using her nickname.....? I also have proof of the grievance being backdated. Funny, how the supervisor that dealt with this grievance just retired from the union, the same time they sent me my arbitration appeal denial. Also the supervisor with forged signatures that dealt with this NRLCA steward on my grievance was transferred to another office, no idea why, but she didn't see it coming. Very interesting indeed.

NRLCA finally sent me the only copy of my initial grievance I have ever seen. I requested this for 10 months and now this NRLCA rep (that told me they don't do arbitration and to hire a lawyer) sends this mystery grievance form, along with citing only part of article 15.1 stating they can do whatever they want completely using it out of context. They can't unilaterally make these decisions, no matter how much they think they can. Narcissism is a common trait with this union. The cherry on top is the fact that line 3b has no initial, making it null and void. It also HIGHLY suggests the grievance was backdated, which is why I was never allowed to see it until now.

The reason the NRLCA is all over you the minute you hire on, is because you are already represented by them and grievances (worthless btw). They want your money for nothing! The ONLY benefits you receive from them by paying them $70+ a month is: Insurance benefits (can find much better deals), monthly magazine, now this is exciting! and stewards to represent you (in my case this is a detriment). Why do you think they make it so hard to leave? You can only resign from the union once per year no more than 20 days and no less than 10 days from your anniversary date.....It's all a con, like most things these days.

Oh and they did the same thing to another carrier in my office. He had a misposted route worse than mine and they conned him into signing a document stating his route became overburdened after the fact and they would give him his overtime pay in vacation time. I couldn't believe he agreed to it, as he'll probably get straight time converted to vacation and lose his overtime pay. Sneaky they are. My sub also has to fight for her correct 10 months of backpay now that mine is documented, so she got totally shafted as well.

After all this it's hilarious that the NRLCA have filed their own Step 4 grievance against USPS, when they knew what they were doing agreeing to RRECS. It's simply smoke and mirrors to make us think they actually care. What they did to me in this grievance process shows they are corrupt to the core and do what they want.
 
Last edited:
No offense here but it's pretty hard to follow what you posted here and when I read that 3b. didn't have a signature(date & signature), that tells me that you did not initiate the grievance. Like I said, I don't know what all went on here but it sounds like you did receive the compensation and I don't know what more you expected to get. Maybe more clarity would help.
 
I may just now be receiving compensation.... still hasn't happened yet. I worked 10 months though for 43K PAY, while working a 48K overburdened rated at 60.61 hours. I find a pretty big issue with that. How many carriers are willing to put up with that? How many companies out there expect their employees to wait 10+ months for compensation for all the extra work?

After 10 years, I finally get a chance to bid on a 43K, moving from my 45K. Need more personal time. The route awarded turned out to be an overburdened 48K - 60.61 hours. The route was posted as a 43K, so my supervisor had it re-evaluated and within 2 weeks. The route should have been split immediately.
No, instead they stopped all communication and denied me any and all information about the evaluation. The grievance took months to even reach step 2, union first said they would arbitrate and then denied it, trying to cover up this mistake.

This is why they denied me arbitration and my appeal, NRLCA knew the truth would come out with an unbiased mediator.

I never once saw the grievance and line 3b is supposed to be signed by a supervisor to validate it. That's another issue in our office, grievances were never done right. The narcissist supervisor that conveniently retired when I was denied arbitration always filled them out, submitted them herself without showing us what they even said or if they even get submitted.

RRECS mistakes are covered up and no one is allowed to know how our routes are evaluated. Any RRECS mistakes are covered up. Ask for RRECS info and see how far you get.

3 people in our office were burned due to this, NRLCA covered it up and denied me Fair Representation.

I really think if you read the entire thing, it's pretty clear that they both committed fraud to cover all this up.

Section 211.2 of Handbook M-38 and the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) state that if a route is misposted or significantly larger than posted, it should have been split off to other nearby carriers immediately.
 
Last edited:
After 10 years, I finally get a chance to bid on a 43K, moving from my 45K. Need more personal time. The route awarded turned out to be an overburdened 48K - 60.61 hours. The route was posted as a 43K, so my supervisor had it re-evaluated and within 2 weeks. Then they stopped all communication and denied me any and all information about the evaluation. The grievance took months to even reach step 2, union first said they would arbitrate and then denied it, trying to cover up this mistake.

This is why they denied me arbitration and my appeal, NRLCA knew the truth would come out with an unbiased mediator.

I never once saw the grievance and line 3b is supposed to be signed by a supervisor to validate it. That's another issue in our office, grievances were never done right. The narcissist supervisor that conveniently retired when I was denied arbitration always filled them out, submitted them herself without showing us what they even said or if they even get submitted.

RRECS mistakes are covered up and no one is allowed to know how our routes are evaluated. Ask for RRECS info and see how far you get.

3 people in our office were burned due to this, NRLCA covered it up and denied me Fair Representation.

I really think if you read the entire thing, it's pretty clear that they both committed fraud to cover all this up.

Section 211.2 of Handbook M-39 and the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) state that if a route is misposted or significantly larger than posted, it should have been split off to other nearby carriers immediately.
Not sure on the MOU you are stating but the reference to the M39 is for city carriers not rural carriers. And I guess I don't understand the "arbitration" aspect. It appears the grievance was settled at Step 2? So it wouldn't go beyond that and arbitration is when there a disciplinary grievance that is denied at Step 3 and they determine that there is sufficient evidence to go further not for a posting grievance.
 
The same applies to rural carriers, my bad I'll correct it M38.

The grievance was settled at step 2 after 10 months without my knowledge or consent!!

I'm not explaining this any further, if you can't figure out what happened from all this information then I simply cannot help you.
 
Ok, I will leave it to you. You come on here and seem to ask for help and when someone tries to give you accurate info you bristle up. It clearly appears you do not understand the grievance process since your grievance was settled at step 2. No they don't confer with you on the process or settlement most of the time and that is 100% normal and do not need your consent. It sounds as if you were compensated for the time and monies owed to you and I don't understand what more you are looking for. As far as "relief" on the route for being overburdened, you should ready Article 9.2.C.8 for your answer. It is clearly spelled out in the contract how you should receive assistance on an overburdened route.
 
The same applies to rural carriers, my bad I'll correct it M38.

The grievance was settled at step 2 after 10 months without my knowledge or consent!!

I'm not explaining this any further, if you can't figure out what happened from all this information then I simply cannot help you.
And no it does not apply to rural carriers!
 
One issue with receiving ANY amount of back pay , let alone a 5 hour amount at an overtime rate for 10 months , is all of the deductions that ensue. Especially that one deduction classified as "misc" which will be by far the largest of all of the deductions and , yet , not discernible. I would anticipate 4 digits to the LEFT of the decimal point. There are other issues associated with this as well. I hope that the union was able to secure a timeline for the receiving of the back pay other than "as soon as administratively possible."
 
What position do you hold at NRLCA justacarrier?

You sure are missing the point here about the forged signatures, backdated grievance I never even saw, step 2 taking 10 months, NRLCA delaying and denying arbitration, grievances filed without carrier approval, UNILATERAL decisions, denial of misposting, not correcting route immediately after evaluation and on and on.

You should brush up on the grievance process and how it SHOULD actually work according to contract.

I didn't post this for advice, but as information for others on what to expect when this happens to them.

The ONLY reason I'm getting my backpay finally is because I filed an EEO.
 
Last edited:
The ONLY reason I'm getting my backpay finally is because I filed an EEO
Not at all defending the union but this could / would explain the "waiting time" for the grievance. From Article 15.4.E.1 in part ;

E. EEO Complaints

1. The processing of any grievance regarding an issue or
fact situation which is also the subject of a formal EEO
complaint shall be deferred until a final agency (USPS)
decision or decision on appeal there from is rendered on
the EEO complaint.


So, the grievance is "held" pending the outcome of the EEO Complaint or any process thereof which would include mediation.

Further on in the same Article details that issues that are separate from the original EEO complaint may be resurrected in the grievance process.
 
Back
Top