I don't know if this specific issue is addressed in the contract--quick glance at the relevant Articles and I only see info on filling vacant auxiliary routes. I'd contact your DR for guidance.If aux route is either significantly reduced in hours or abolished and parceled out to build up regular routes after RRECS is implemented, does the senior sub have the right to bump a junior sub off another aux that lost less/remained intact?
educated guess: noIf aux route is either significantly reduced in hours or abolished and parceled out to build up regular routes after RRECS is implemented, does the senior sub have the right to bump a junior sub off another aux that lost less/remained intact?
As far as i remember the only time routes go up for bid is when an encumbered regular route is consolidated then any route that got a piece of that route would be up for bid. This only applies to regulars not RCA's. If through a consolidation or elimination of any route there are now too many RCA's then the junior RCA is laid off and the RCA without a route gets that vacancy.I may be wrong but I believe if a rebuild happens all the routes are supposed to go up for bid again... I would guess during that process the same process of asking senior sub if they want the AUX route(s) or not would occur.. but you never know in this place
always understood that besides hours, a, reason to take the 5 - 1 , if routes consolidated or eliminated, you would have a place to landAs far as i remember the only time routes go up for bid is when an encumbered regular route is consolidated then any route that got a piece of that route would be up for bid. This only applies to regulars not RCA's. If through a consolidation or elimination of any route there are now too many RCA's then the junior RCA is laid off and the RCA without a route gets that vacancy.