"It", the software, won't factor actual hours when determining best case adjustments or route squaring. "It", management, will continue to use collective undertime as a means of reducing time standards per usual. Going forward, they now hold the "irrefutable" data to present to make that happen. In keeping with their view that efficiency and incentive don't exist, routes with lots of undertime will be scrutinized as to why the anomaly exists and how to correct it.
How long after mini mail count do we see our new route evaluation?
- Thread starter Montana406
- Start date
RollinRural
Well-known member
The time standards can’t be changed. Why are you saying these things? Everything you said is misinformation. It no longer works that way now that we have rrecs. This is the beauty of rrecs. The genius if you will.
Undertime can no longer be used against us to negotiate time standards, the standards are fixed. All they can try to do is rush you when loading and at end of shift, period.
DB.Cooper
Well-known member
You're delusional.... they're continually changing $#!+ under RRECS.... and that's what we can see... gotta believe they're changing a helluva lot we can't see.... wasn't something just changed under cbu coverage factors, as just one example.... duh....
FrozenToes
Well-known member
Software is written/coded. Then there are inputs. Any parameters could be entered at the Headquarters level. Do you know their goal? I do know
they have always had an issue with undertime.
DB.Cooper
Well-known member
I think undertime was a big target for RRECS.... I'm doubtful they won't continue efforts to stamp it out where it still exists....
DB.Cooper
Well-known member
FrozenToes
Well-known member
I don't think you guys are grasping what I'm saying.I think undertime was a big target for RRECS.... I'm doubtful they won't continue efforts to stamp it out where it still exists....
But whatever.
It has more to do with changing the makeup of a route via miles, types of delivery etc..
Shannonboy
Well-known member
From henceforth, I dub thee Sir Charlie Brown's Mom....all comments shall begin with Whaa, and end with, waa, wa.
Do you think before you post this crap you put on here, ABSOLUTELY MAKES NO SENSE. Use your brain Rr..good grief..
jsthere723
Well-known member
Where in the hell you get that time standards can’t be changed ! I have seen you claiming the same thing before. It is never static . Nobody claims that . Neither the PO nor the union . Present standard is with the existing structure. Structure can be changed and therefore the standards too . Sorry, The reply is for RollinRural . I accidentally tagged 43 months
DB.Cooper
Well-known member
Whatever the means.... the end result will be to reduce undertime.... maybe they'll use novel methods to achieve those ends.... didn't somebody say they're gonna use some sort of AI to do this.... I figure cost savings will be the goal, as was the "engineering" of RRECS....I don't think you guys are grasping what I'm saying.
But whatever.
It has more to do with changing the makeup of a route via miles, types of delivery etc..
Burn the house down?
jokingRollinRural
Well-known member
Routes will be squared up per contract.
Nobody is entitled to anything other than being cut down to a 43k per contract.
Some of you haven’t been here long enough to see routes be “squared up”
Nothing has changed in that regard. You may lose some territory and gain other territory, deal with it.
Each mailbox has a value associated with it and it’s light years better than how routes were adjusted in the past. But some people will always try to invent something to complain about.
Nobody is entitled to anything other than being cut down to a 43k per contract.
Some of you haven’t been here long enough to see routes be “squared up”
Nothing has changed in that regard. You may lose some territory and gain other territory, deal with it.
Each mailbox has a value associated with it and it’s light years better than how routes were adjusted in the past. But some people will always try to invent something to complain about.
YOUAREthecurrentresident
Well-known member
This is what we've been talking about. Theory is...if HQ deems it necessary to square up an office, all decisions will come from their program (not carriers, not PM, not district)...which could potentially change the makeup of every route in the office. The point of them doing that is to condense mileage, save money. I personally don't see how they would be able to curb undertime though. Volume is volume. Whether you get it in the country, get it at cbu or get it curbside. Squaring up an entire office to get all routes to 43k/44k is fine by me. I wouldn't mind getting some country...just drive around & jam to music
DB.Cooper
Well-known member
RollinRural
Well-known member
It basically comes down to whether or not you trust the rrecs system. You obviously don’t, but you refuse to state how many parcels you get on average per day. We have others on this board who have admitted they only work 4 hours per day. It really shouldn’t surprise you that rrecs cut your hours. You need to face reality. You’re not doing 9.6 hours of work to be a 48k.Invent.... like 66% losing pay.... they just "invented" that......
I’m doing 300 parcels per day.
DB.Cooper
Well-known member
I thought you were the one that said you typically worked about 7 hours per day.... that's what I average also, but I have more miles and such.... RRECS isn't really all that accurate in my book.... you can like it all you want.... how many undertime hours are you racking each week????
According to you, you are not doing 9.6 hours of work either. So you think you deserve a drop in your evaluation.
