APWU and NRLCA both need to grieve this. Management can't utilize rural employees beyond the scope of their job description, i.e., unauthorized inclusion, nor can they relax the line between crafts, i.e., failed exclusion.
APWU should go for the overtime or penalty pay they would have received had clerks done the work. No higher compensation evasion by improper means.
NRLCA should go for restitution for the compensation gap between ARC pay and whatever the pay would have been had management utilized the correct craft employee. No discount labor through improper utilization of lower-wage employees.
I'll cram an answer, along with some history and observations if I may.
This is the second PO I've worked at. The first one was in the larger town next to mine and it was a nightmare. I left there because I got an offer from a FedEx ground contractor. That was bad because they paid per day and I couldn't make more than 17/hr no matter how hard I went. I left there quickly and stayed unemployed other than my honey bee removal business which is a major income for me. In truth I am blessed in that I don't HAVE TO work. I'll leave it at that.
My current office is AMAZING! The management is outstanding and almost everyone at the station is as well. Everyone gets along and we are all in there working like crazy but, seemingly, enjoying it. I suspect this is an unusual PO because the people there are up beat and helpful as well.
hamparc -- "I don't want to make enemies here so please understand I'm learning BUT it's management that sees how much help it is to have ONE HOUR of extra help with emptying buggies. It helps EVERYONE."
-- Not necessarily so.
-- One way to look at the situation is that your helping with parcels allows the PM not to hire another clerk.
"Now I go in at 8:30 and have to stand around like an idiot until I get a route. This took 30 minutes yesterday because the boss couldn't yet get determine where I was needed. Standing around makes me feel useless and totally sucks."
-- Do you go in every day at 8:30 and stand around until manglement determine where you will be needed?
-- I suppose that beats staying at home, waiting for the phone to ring.
- Manglement is supposed to do something called SCHEDULING! Such references include the contract, the PO-603, the M-38, as well as Step 4's.
- If scheduled, but not needed, supposedly you should be getting 2 hours of pay ( or it used to be that way ).
-- If not scheduled, but you go in anyways, that saves the PM some $ if you are not needed. But is "costs" you time.
-- Why did you opt to be an ARC instead of an RCA?
I don't want to work full time. Of course I am currently working every week more than 40 but that's not going to last much longer. The ARCs in my office only work 2-3 days most of the year.
I was approached by the shop steward yesterday. She said she's filing grievances and is asking all the ARCs about their work emptying buggies during peak. I initially told her I'm not comfortable answering questions so we went to my supervisor who said I should go ahead answer the questions which I did.
This is how I see it :
The shop steward, if successful, will cost the PO $. Why? Why initiate a grievance for a few days where ARCs did clerk work for a lousy few days or, maximum, a week? Why not just look the other way for a reasonable amount of time BEFORE biting the hand that feeds you. I believe that some rules are made to be bent and/or broken for the sake of productivity and efficiency in the work environment.
Yes. I am anti union BTW.
You don’t seem to understand that we work under the rules of a contract. This is not a “pet peeve” of the shop steward. Why are you so upset with your shop steward instead of your supervisor who appears to be a moron and brings people in before they are needed and then can’t make a decision on how to use them?
If you feel that the way we work is “inefficient”—first, we’d all agree with you, but I think for different reasons. Anyway, you have options here:
1. Violate the contract
2. Stand around and do nothing (Careful! Someone might mistake you for a supervisor then!)
3. Ask if you can be scheduled a half hour later
4. Go to work somewhere more “efficient” than the USPS.
Because I’m curious: what’s going on in your office that you’re still running parcels the second week of January?
Huh? We had 6k parcels yesterday for 26 routes. I honestly don't know if that's a lot or not but I got back from run #2 at 5:45 and there was still a few routes that needed help with parcels.
I spoke with my supervisor yesterday and she helped me greatly by telling me to just pick a route that has a pile of boxes and start working when I come in at 8:30. Prior to this I'd have to wait for her to tell me what route to take. Problem there is that she's dealing with the hot case and other stuff early AM and she used to have to stop and look at routes herself in order to tell me where to go. Now I'm on my own to decide what route needs help.
The parcels don't get finished being scanned until maybe 9 but now I can take what's available, mark, sort etc and, by the time I'm finished doing a cart, I will have plenty more when I return with my empty cart to refill it.
I'm not here to defend a supervisor however my supervisor is outstanding. She will be having ARCs start later soon but currently there is enough for us to do starting at 8:30. Being new I wasn't aware that picking my own route to help with was an option.
As far as I'm concerned the shop steward is human waste who simply wants to nit pick anything. IMO it's to justify her position.
Thanks for all the help and advice here.