Well, I hope the both of you are correct. I stated, " I was wondering" , because if RRECS isn't compensating us for NOT servicing different boxes on particular days , why would that same program include the "not serviced" boxes in the DSM on a daily basis ? And I mean active boxes . Just no mail service on any given day(s). When
@BraveHrt68 says , " You cant multiply different daily drive times by six. If nothing changes on your route....your drive time is the same every day. " , I disagree. You can have 6 totally different daily drive times and then add them all together and then divide by 6 to get the average drive time for the week. Just like 6 different coverage factors for a given week all added together and divided by 6 to the weekly coverage factor for that week. For now, I am going by The Guide where upon it repeatedly states "A mile in which the rural carrier is in a neighborhood and
stops every 100 feet or so....." from example A in The Guide ," A mile in which the carrier
stops for boxes that are more spread out...." from example B in The Guide , " A mile of “dead‐head” in which the carrier makes
no stops for boxes or traffic......." from example C in The Guide. I keep seeing the word "stops" and even the "no stop" citation. I also see this in The Guide ;
RRECS contains algorithms that identify the
time that a vehicle stops and the time that
it starts again from the GPS breadcrumb
data generated by the MDD.
RECS uses algorithms and the pooled data to
estimate when the device speed falls below
a specified threshold (about walking speed)
and defines this as a stop.
On any given day, an interval between two
mapped stops is defined as a valid interval if
the daily breadcrumb path indicates a
stop at
both locations and no unidentified stops occur
between them.
I looked at 3 or 4 of my 4241As and saw different drive times and that's with only the occasional change of one or two boxes from active to vacant or vice versa. So, nowhere near enough change to really impact drive time. As I said, I hope the both of you are correct. Not that I was "wrong" because I was just wondering / thinking.