damifiknow
Well-known member
the coverage factor is now part of the usps plan to bring us down , its been ongoing for a year or so now i was at 90 down to 77 , you have to fight back.
Same at our office. Managers said last week that our package volume is up 16% from last year but most routes lost hours. It’s a money grab and with rrecs you can’t really win a grievance. They gonna take your handwritten numbers over what “the system” says?Either someone fudged the numbers or something changed with the calculations and they didnt say anything because it’s looking like most carriers are seeing the biggest drops since the first mail count. Every route in my office that got numbers dropped 2-3 hours in evaluation, and this is after we just went through christmas mail volume and UPS packages came back. The numbers from the mini mail survey were pretty close to the last count so we all assumed we would stay the same, at most lose or gain an hour, so to see 3 hour drops has been a shock to everyone, even the managers at our station are saying something must be up. Someone make it make sense
In my office parcel volume is deceptive. We have Amazon and deliver a lot of large parcels and you can have multiple hampers full and still come out with only 150 scans for the day. We have a route with a new development that started getting two or three hampers full of parcels each day. Out of curiosity, another carrier--certain that the route must be getting 200-300 parcels a day--started checking his scans against the other route. Turned out, they were very similar. The other route just got a lot of bigger packages that made it seem like they were getting so much more.Lost and hour and a half, still a 41J when I started as an H. Not sure how I lost so much time when the office package volume seems substantially higher than when I started a year and a half ago.
For the first time since RRECS, all 4 carriers lost big time. Usually up 1 to 2 hours on one then down 1-2 hours on the next. I lost 4 hours after losing 2 last time and now at 43 J from 43K. My route has been a K route for over 20 years. The other 3 carriers each lost 5 hours but they are still K's. SMH. The longer I'm here the less I make. What irritates me the most is things like coverage factor, lost signals, WHS for most all the route, etc,. that we know are not being accounted for right and we can't do anything about it.
the coverage factor is now part of the usps plan to bring us down , its been ongoing for a year or so now i was at 90 down to 77 , you have to fight back.
How much surepost did you get before they stopped dropping off at our docks? Idk about everyone else, but by not having surepost my parcel volume cratered. Now that it’s back, I’m averaging 15-20 dismounts MORE per DAY. That’s about 40 mins per DAY, 3 hours per week of time credits that I lost for the entire year of 2025. I’m thinking a lot of carriers didn’t realize how much UPS they got on their routes…I bet a lot of their routes will be right back up next spring mms.Here is my issue with RRECS.
Think about this way. You would think after the 1st count that any big losses would be gone unless you lose Amazon or something major happens.
But all of sudden boom now people are losing 3-5 hours a time. Something is wrong with this.
It's not just parcel volume. DPS is down across the board. Since DPS is the primary driver of coverage factor - it makes sense the numbers are down. Also, less wss coverages now. And cbu delivery was sort of screwed from the beginning unless a carrier input a coverage per day. The mapping self adjusting addresses and cbu compartments is and has been a mega issue from day one. Every district and above union steward knew this. They simply couldn't convince the board of the inherent mathematical favors build into the system to help USPS gain leverage on volume and coverage.In my office parcel volume is deceptive. We have Amazon and deliver a lot of large parcels and you can have multiple hampers full and still come out with only 150 scans for the day. We have a route with a new development that started getting two or three hampers full of parcels each day. Out of curiosity, another carrier--certain that the route must be getting 200-300 parcels a day--started checking his scans against the other route. Turned out, they were very similar. The other route just got a lot of bigger packages that made it seem like they were getting so much more.
How much surepost did you get before they stopped dropping off at our docks? Idk about everyone else, but by not having surepost my parcel volume cratered. Now that it’s back, I’m averaging 15-20 dismounts MORE per DAY. That’s about 40 mins per DAY, 3 hours per week of time credits that I lost for the entire year of 2025. I’m thinking a lot of carriers didn’t realize how much UPS they got on their routes…I bet a lot of their routes will be right back up next spring mms.
My comment was just to offer an explanation as to how it can feel you’re getting so many packages now when you’re really getting about the same (or even less), but way more big packages. And we get paid the same to take a medium size box to the door as we do a huge one.It's not just parcel volume.
I’ve been saying hourly is only way, but I am minority. Most say if we go hourly there is no point, they like going home early.It's not just parcel volume. DPS is down across the board. Since DPS is the primary driver of coverage factor - it makes sense the numbers are down. Also, less wss coverages now. And cbu delivery was sort of screwed from the beginning unless a carrier input a coverage per day. The mapping self adjusting addresses and cbu compartments is and has been a mega issue from day one. Every district and above union steward knew this. They simply couldn't convince the board of the inherent mathematical favors build into the system to help USPS gain leverage on volume and coverage.
What your route was 20 years ago has no bearing on current volume or activity.
I'm sad to hear of the losses by many but, carriers really do need to think more about their actions and how to capture every second they can.
The only way to recoup wage for rurals is to go to hourly. It could be an option to elect per year, as a new regular can or something else. As long as the union pushes the evaluated system, the long-term prognosis of the craft is loss. And even more morale issues.
The nrlca must support rrecs for a study amount of time before it can present a case of failure of system. It's been long enough to consider a failure.
I’ve been saying hourly is only way, but I am minority. Most say if we go hourly there is no point, they like going home early.
Either someone fudged the numbers or something changed with the calculations and they didnt say anything because it’s looking like most carriers are seeing the biggest drops since the first mail count. Every route in my office that got numbers dropped 2-3 hours in evaluation, and this is after we just went through christmas mail volume and UPS packages came back. The numbers from the mini mail survey were pretty close to the last count so we all assumed we would stay the same, at most lose or gain an hour, so to see 3 hour drops has been a shock to everyone, even the managers at our station are saying something must be up. Someone make it make sense
Every route lost 1-3 hours. This whole thing is beyond a fair labor act. Every 6 months we drop. Coverage factor of dps is a joke, what about the raw letters going to boxes that had no dps. Bundled flats getting counted “at the plant” is a joke. Our table 2 regulars with less than 10 years are getting crushed and feel so helpless. It’s just beyond anything we could have imagined. I guess the PO is not broke anymore from all the hours lostEither someone fudged the numbers or something changed with the calculations and they didnt say anything because it’s looking like most carriers are seeing the biggest drops since the first mail count. Every route in my office that got numbers dropped 2-3 hours in evaluation, and this is after we just went through christmas mail volume and UPS packages came back. The numbers from the mini mail survey were pretty close to the last count so we all assumed we would stay the same, at most lose or gain an hour, so to see 3 hour drops has been a shock to everyone, even the managers at our station are saying something must be up. Someone make it make sense
You make a good point, especially if that was your stand alone impression of daily package throughput. For me, my "feel", later bounced off the scanner end of day, occurred during load out. Hamper appearance in the A.M. was a coarse reading accompanied by the thought of how many were other route's and how many of mine were misthrown.My comment was just to offer an explanation as to how it can feel you’re getting so many packages now when you’re really getting about the same (or even less), but way more big packages. And we get paid the same to take a medium size box to the door as we do a huge one.
I am one of those newer regulars. I have fought for over 3 years now just trying to stay a K route. My route is now a 43J. 22 minutes under a 40K. Lost over 2 hours in 6 months.Every route lost 1-3 hours. This whole thing is beyond a fair labor act. Every 6 months we drop. Coverage factor of dps is a joke, what about the raw letters going to boxes that had no dps. Bundled flats getting counted “at the plant” is a joke. Our table 2 regulars with less than 10 years are getting crushed and feel so helpless. It’s just beyond anything we could have imagined. I guess the PO is not broke anymore from all the hours lost
If we go hourly, is there even any point to being a separate craft? At least NALC has penalty, OT, double-time rates and so on.I’ve been saying hourly is only way, but I am minority. Most say if we go hourly there is no point, they like going home early.
Gained another hour. Back to 48k again.
I wish I at leasGained another hour. Back to 48k again.
Oh they’re definitely saving money now! Funny how every headline has been how we won’t have money next year and then we all drop 3 hours. Here’s the kicker, out of all the routes in my office is, 1 route did go “up”…a route that has consistently went down every count, hasn’t had much growth, and the MMS was done so terribly wrong that it should have dropped again, but it went “up”. And I say “up” in “” because it went from a 45J, to a 40K….. so he just lost 10 hours per pay period and the post office is taking a ton of money back, so did he really go up or was it better financially for the post office to push him to a 40k? Hmm just a thought, but it’s fishyEvery route lost 1-3 hours. This whole thing is beyond a fair labor act. Every 6 months we drop. Coverage factor of dps is a joke, what about the raw letters going to boxes that had no dps. Bundled flats getting counted “at the plant” is a joke. Our table 2 regulars with less than 10 years are getting crushed and feel so helpless. It’s just beyond anything we could have imagined. I guess the PO is not broke anymore from all the hours lost