Rt2mailman
Well-known member
Speed in itself does nothing to lower evaluation. The problems that arise from speed is the typical lack of interest in precise scanning due to focus being on getting done early. It is rare to see a carrier that gets done with his 8+ hour route in 4-5 hours make every scan that he should be making. Unscanned parcels, additional authorized dismounts/trips to the door, proper pick up scans, and proper edit book/mapping/case work is often neglected for all the speedsters in my office. They will even work off the clock with early starts just to be the first one back, then wonder why their evaluation went down.Is there really a speed aspect to our evaluations?
If my data in Rrecs (mileage, volume, mailboxes, CBU's, etc...) says 10 hrs per day, but I bust through it everyday and get it done in 7, are you saying that my new eval having exactly the same Rrecs data as before, is going to go down?
An arbitrator commanded Rrecs to be put in place. The biggest argument the USPS had in their favor was showing the paid hours verses the worked hours. All of the fast carriers that didn't care to do everything we are supposed to do in our jobs, but focused on getting done early were the biggest cause that inflicted us with Rrecs.