need clarity
- Thread starter mslette86
- Start date
mslette86 -- "Does anyone know what a non scheduled crossfoot is? no pay involved, but looks like an increase in annual/sick leave."
-- Are you a rural carrier?
-- Where did you see the term "non schedule crossfoot"? On your pay stub?
-- In the F-18 ( Payroll Journal Guide ), it mentions "Negative cross-foot" as a Code 63. And "Nonscheduled cross-foot hours" as a Code 76 in Appendix A -- and no where else!
-- Such codes usually apply to postal workers who are paid hourly and not applied to rural carriers.
-- Could be whom ever is making TACS entries is making mistaken entries.
-- One on-line poster put it this way: "TACS requires that 40 hours be input for everyone. So if you work ( say ) 27 hours one week, TACS would reguire that 13 hours of "non schedulted" time also be entered to account for a full 40 hours. It is just a placeholder, really, showing how many hours short of 40 you actually are."
-- In the real world, probably an "accounting" term.
-- Anyone?
-- Are you a rural carrier?
-- Where did you see the term "non schedule crossfoot"? On your pay stub?
-- In the F-18 ( Payroll Journal Guide ), it mentions "Negative cross-foot" as a Code 63. And "Nonscheduled cross-foot hours" as a Code 76 in Appendix A -- and no where else!
-- Such codes usually apply to postal workers who are paid hourly and not applied to rural carriers.
-- Could be whom ever is making TACS entries is making mistaken entries.
-- One on-line poster put it this way: "TACS requires that 40 hours be input for everyone. So if you work ( say ) 27 hours one week, TACS would reguire that 13 hours of "non schedulted" time also be entered to account for a full 40 hours. It is just a placeholder, really, showing how many hours short of 40 you actually are."
-- In the real world, probably an "accounting" term.
-- Anyone?
callofthewild
Well-known member
Sounds like something a Mail Carrier gets when they have stepped in a hole on the mail route.
