Not sure this is the right thread but hopefully someone can answer my questions. We currently have 1 fullish route(6.80) not on the matrix and 1 aux route(2.5) not on the matrix. the head RCA and I usually do the aux route. The full route regular tends to take off one day in the week. And usually the lowest RCA is given this route to cover. They do not have a secondary or third just a primary.
This week I was put on the aux route for 4 days . Our second to last seniority was then given the full route to do one day as it conflicted with the last seniority RCA primary taking off. In result 2nd to last seniority is getting more hours then everyone else in the office as they already had 2 full route days and a split day and will now be getting another full route day. My question is it right that someone with lower seniority then me should be getting a higher evaluated route while I am scheduled for a aux route that is not on my matrix.
I haven't said anything about the lowest RCA taking on the full route because we all get close the the same amount of hours. This was a big issue last year with this RCA getting more clerking hours. We were told we can't grieve because matrix nor seniority matter in that situation. When the schedule first comes out everything is nearly even. With those with POV usually getting more work but not always. However it always seems when extra hours come up somehow this RCA gets them. Now I do realize that the new RCA could choose these 2 routes as her 2nd and 3rd and we'd all be screwed for extra hours on those routes.
So questions:
Can they ignore the seniority for a route if I am put on an aux route that is not on my matrix?
Can I request that the matrix be redone? We have a regular back, a new rca, 2 routes without subs, and they won't assign the aux route.
Should I just leave it and take what I can get?
This week I was put on the aux route for 4 days . Our second to last seniority was then given the full route to do one day as it conflicted with the last seniority RCA primary taking off. In result 2nd to last seniority is getting more hours then everyone else in the office as they already had 2 full route days and a split day and will now be getting another full route day. My question is it right that someone with lower seniority then me should be getting a higher evaluated route while I am scheduled for a aux route that is not on my matrix.
I haven't said anything about the lowest RCA taking on the full route because we all get close the the same amount of hours. This was a big issue last year with this RCA getting more clerking hours. We were told we can't grieve because matrix nor seniority matter in that situation. When the schedule first comes out everything is nearly even. With those with POV usually getting more work but not always. However it always seems when extra hours come up somehow this RCA gets them. Now I do realize that the new RCA could choose these 2 routes as her 2nd and 3rd and we'd all be screwed for extra hours on those routes.
So questions:
Can they ignore the seniority for a route if I am put on an aux route that is not on my matrix?
Can I request that the matrix be redone? We have a regular back, a new rca, 2 routes without subs, and they won't assign the aux route.
Should I just leave it and take what I can get?