• Please keep questions in the Questions forum to contract, procedures, and requests for documentation. Vehicle, TSP, retirement, etc questions please post in the regular forums. Thank you
  • Everyone, please help make our jobs easier and choose the correct category. Thank you

Relief day with no rural relief

Status
Not open for further replies.

muttleycrue

Well-known member
I was given a bit of information, but not enough to know how it applies.
Office has no RCAs. Nearby offices (entire county, actually) have no RCAs. Office does have a surplus of CCAs.
PM is using CCAs as relief for rurals.

I was told that if CCAs are used, the regular (on RDWL) is entitled to work the relief day for either DACA 3 or 5, and getting the CCA to cover a different day of the week.

Does anyone have details on this? MOU? Can't find reference in contract under the other relief day articles.
 
I was given a bit of information, but not enough to know how it applies.
Office has no RCAs. Nearby offices (entire county, actually) have no RCAs. Office does have a surplus of CCAs.
PM is using CCAs as relief for rurals.

I was told that if CCAs are used, the regular (on RDWL) is entitled to work the relief day for either DACA 3 or 5, and getting the CCA to cover a different day of the week.

Does anyone have details on this? MOU? Can't find reference in contract under the other relief day articles.
Rural Carriers have EVERY right to work PRIOR to using another Craft Employee. Only Rural Craft has access to RRECS. RDWL Carriers should be filing EVERY time a CCA is used instead of them regardless of any 2080/2240 projected issues.
Not only is mgmt affecting the Carrier by withholding Overtime, they are affecting the Route projected pay since they cannot utilize RRECS. 1 Day a week may not seem like a big deal but expand that over 52 weeks & there’s 2 months of no RRECS data.
 
Rural Carriers have EVERY right to work PRIOR to using another Craft Employee. Only Rural Craft has access to RRECS. RDWL Carriers should be filing EVERY time a CCA is used instead of them regardless of any 2080/2240 projected issues.
Not only is mgmt affecting the Carrier by withholding Overtime, they are affecting the Route projected pay since they cannot utilize RRECS. 1 Day a week may not seem like a big deal but expand that over 52 weeks & there’s 2 months of no RRECS data.
Absolutely. File every single time another craft is given priority over rural craft carriers, no matter 2240 oro whatever, it's irrelevant in this instance.

Let me reiterate one thing you said. Losing ONE DAY is HUGE when it comes to evaluation.
 
Absolutely. File every single time another craft is given priority over rural craft carriers, no matter 2240 oro whatever, it's irrelevant in this instance.

Let me reiterate one thing you said. Losing ONE DAY is HUGE when it comes to evaluation.
If I have to forfeit EVERY SINGLE DAY OFF for the rest of the long-foreseeable future, the RRECS results won't make any freaking difference. My body will break down long before any RRECS results are finalized.
 
Our National Agreement never permits management to utilize employees from other crafts. Only management may perform craft duties under conditions of Article 1.6. No other employee is qualified to perform the work. (See Article 7)

Grieve every time a non-rural does rural work, even for 1 minute of labor.

ELM §348.12.png
 
I was given a bit of information, but not enough to know how it applies.
Office has no RCAs. Nearby offices (entire county, actually) have no RCAs. Office does have a surplus of CCAs.
PM is using CCAs as relief for rurals.

I was told that if CCAs are used, the regular (on RDWL) is entitled to work the relief day for either DACA 3 or 5, and getting the CCA to cover a different day of the week.

Does anyone have details on this? MOU? Can't find reference in contract under the other relief day articles.
CCAs can cover rural as a last resort per the City contract not Rural contract. Regulars would always have the option if not on RDRL to work their K day before a CCA would be allowed to.
 
CCAs can cover rural as a last resort per the City contract not Rural contract. Regulars would always have the option if not on RDRL to work their K day before a CCA would be allowed to.
@Dexter, would you please provide your source?

Rural bargaining unit work cannot be negotiated into non-rural agreements without tripartite consent (both bargaining units and the employer). The rural craft Agreement specifically excludes city craft employees from performing rural craft bargaining unit work.
Article 1.2(f).png
 
@Dexter, would you please provide your source?

Rural bargaining unit work cannot be negotiated into non-rural agreements without tripartite consent (both bargaining units and the employer). The rural craft Agreement specifically excludes city craft employees from performing rural craft bargaining unit work.
View attachment 7287
Like you posted above, #f, "All other bargaining unit craft employees.", does not apply to the NRLCA contract. Which means the NRLCA contract does not adhere or abide to any other craft employee outside the NRLCA. Therefore the city contract (NLCA) would allow them to work outside of their respective craft. In all practicality a CCA by their contract at the direction of management would allow a CCA to assist with covering a rural route. But, for that to happen management has to show that it exhausted all available resources including all in office RCAs/PTFs, outside office within 50 miles RCAs, and management themselves to cover a route. Does that happen in said order? Usually not. Management will typically assign a CCA to cover a rural route before they carry a route but they will carry a route if need be. It would be the city steward to file a grievance if their contract is violated by sending a CCA to cover a rural route unless I (as a rural steward) can show that all other avenues were exhausted before the assignment of a CCA. Several conversations with our local city steward and his grievance(s) are filed when a regular city carrier is denied leave (annual, K-day, etc.) and mandated to work to have a CCA cover a rural route.
 
Like you posted above, #f, "All other bargaining unit craft employees.", does not apply to the NRLCA contract. Which means the NRLCA contract does not adhere or abide to any other craft employee outside the NRLCA. Therefore the city contract (NLCA) would allow them to work outside of their respective craft. In all practicality a CCA by their contract at the direction of management would allow a CCA to assist with covering a rural route. But, for that to happen management has to show that it exhausted all available resources including all in office RCAs/PTFs, outside office within 50 miles RCAs, and management themselves to cover a route. Does that happen in said order? Usually not. Management will typically assign a CCA to cover a rural route before they carry a route but they will carry a route if need be. It would be the city steward to file a grievance if their contract is violated by sending a CCA to cover a rural route unless I (as a rural steward) can show that all other avenues were exhausted before the assignment of a CCA. Several conversations with our local city steward and his grievance(s) are filed when a regular city carrier is denied leave (annual, K-day, etc.) and mandated to work to have a CCA cover a rural route.
I disagree.

The 1975-1978 Agreement was the last time other crafts were permitted to cross rural lines and perform rural craft bargaining unit work.

ezpdf.snapshot.3.png
It was one of the NRLCA's main contentions for separating from the rest of the postal union's and bargaining independently from them in the subsequent 1978-1981 NRLCA National Agreement.

ezpdf.snapshot.4.png

The NALC wanted to retain its remaining grip on crossing into other crafts, so it negotiated a memo so it wouldn't lose the ground it did in 1978...

ezpdf.snapshot.1.png

... because the NALC's 1978 agreement did not include the NRLCA.

ezpdf.snapshot.2.png

Dual appointments were the exception to the rule. When a dual appointment employee is in their casual capacity (as opposed to their craft capacity) it's not considered "crossing crafts". They transform into a lower-paid, generic employee with a pulse.

As still part of today's NRLCA Article 30.2.D.6, the 1978-1981 NRLCA National Agreement permitted qualified employees to perform bargaining unit work once management exhausted their supply of bargaining unit employees.

ezpdf.snapshot.6.png

Then (and now), the only qualified employees were management employees (under Article 1.6) and employees with a dual appointment. Between the two, the Employer retained/retains discretionary authority as to which to assign the remaining rural craft bargaining unit work.

If memory serves me well, "dual appointments" were axed around the turn of the last decade, leaving management as the remaining employees in the pool of qualified employees that can be utilized in Article 30.2.D.6 situations.

Therefore the city contract (NLCA) would allow them to work outside of their respective craft. In all practicality a CCA by their contract at the direction of management would allow a CCA to assist with covering a rural route. But, for that to happen management has to show that it exhausted all available resources including all in office RCAs/PTFs, outside office within 50 miles RCAs, and management themselves to cover a route.

I don't see how this condition applies. Would you please further explain?

The generically termed "50-mile rule" is a reference to Handbook F-15, Travel and Relocation, section 7-1.1.1. It does not preclude management from going beyond 50 miles into the realm of "regular travel" (see also section 7-1.1.2). In fact, I understand some city craft employees have been under regular travel in some of the larger cities and are placed in hotel rooms for a period just to deliver backed-up piles of mail. Given the cost, I can't see it happening on the rural side any time soon.
 
Last edited:
Dominator, heartfelt thanks for your wealth of knowledge and sharing information.

If/when I file grievances for every day that a city carrier delivers my route on my J-days, annual leave, sick leave, etc., what is the remedy? Does rural carrier get paid OT, or does rural carrier get all future leave cancelled/denied?
The harm includes an obligation placed upon an NALC employee (performing rural craft bargaining unit work} which management had no right to place. That grievance is the NALC's to battle.

The harm also includes an entitlement to rural craft bargaining unit work that management refused to provide. Depending on the circumstances, a proposed remedy could go different directions. The contract doesn't provide an automatic remedy for this kind of issue. Regardless of any proposal though, the "remedy" is whatever both sides agree to, or what an arbitrator awards.

In the scenerio you provided (a city craft employee delivers your route while you're absent, regardless of DACA) the number of violations will depend on the circumstances. Typically, remedies should provide no less than what you would have been entitled if not for the violation. For repeat and/or egregious violations, the remedy sought may be more substantial.

I'd aim nothing less than the following:
  1. Payment to the employee directly entitled to the workhours lost for whichever is greater (I'd ask for the overtime rate):
    1. The equivalant number of hours the city craft employee(s) worked, OR;
    2. The evaluation of the route carried.
  2. Payment for all lost TSP matching funds which would be received had it not been for the violation.
  3. Management's agreement to perpetually cease and desist utilizing ineligible non-rural craft employees to perform rural craft bargaining work.
  4. In the event management utilizes a non-rural craft employee to perform rural craft bargaining unit work, regardless of propriety or eligibility, without charge to the union, managment will provide the district representative and the certified representative of the office with:
    1. Written notice of the factual circumstances which influenced management's decision to provide rural craft bargaining unit work to non-rural craft bargaining unit employees
    2. Current PS Form 3972 for all local-level supervisory employees within a 50-mile radius of the local office.
  5. All local rural craft employees of the delivery unit will receive a GATS payment for $50 within one (1) pay period. This payable amount will accumulate by $50 for each successive violation of this settlement, independent of any other grievance resolution.
There may be other considerations depending on whether the regular is on the RDWL, if the carrier had leave adjacent to the J-day when the violation occurred... there are many elements and factors to consider.

Management may still choose to disapprove Annual leave under Article 10.2 if there aren't any leave replacements available. Management may try to spin it as though "the grievance did this", but in reality, management never had a right to use city craft employees as though they were rural craft leave replacements.

Management may still utilize regular carriers on relief days under Article 8.5.

Using ineligible employees to perform rural carrier duties is a big problem because, if ignored, it sidesteps the entire Agreement as though a "rural craft" doesn't exist. Management is unilaterally declaring who can work, what work they will perform, and the wages/hours/benefits provided for the work as though it were a non-unionized environment.

It's just bad news.
 
Other Craft never have any right to Rural Work. ALL Available Rural Craft should be working prior to utilizing a CCA, Clerk, or mgmt to run a route.
A Grievance most certainly should be filed by the next-in-line sub, RDWL Carrier, or non-RDWL Carrier & be compensated for the lost opportunity for wages. With RRECS procedures NOT available to the other crafts, the route is being harmed with the lack of credited timings & extra dismount distances.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top