You’re not understanding my response because you lack a basic academic formation.
Again, I said you only made statements of opinion which are neither true nor false, you simply stated how you feel.
Your opinions are worthless to me, because you don’t understand how rrecs works or how the old system worked,
You just want to argue: rrecs bad vs rrecs good. Go back and read through the hundreds of rrecs threads to better inform yourself.
Goodbye.
Hhhmmmmmm, you said “you didn’t make any true statements” but then you say “you only made statements of opinion, which is neither true, nor false” so which is it? Did I not make true statements? Or, did I make statements that are not true nor false? Your right, my acedemic formation, can not understand what your TRYING to teach me (us) (Maybe it isn’t me? (us) that’s “academically challenged.) I can’t be not right, then right and wrong. I know, I don’t fully understand wrecks (like you think you do), but I’m willing to actually listen to reasoning as to where wrecks is right, or wrong. I’m willing to see (most) people’s thoughts/knowledge on wrecks, but when only 1 person argues, time and time again, how wrecks is “gods gift from heaven”, yet everybody else disagrees, I must ask “who is more “academically challenged”? (Db, make a vote post, who’s academically more challenged? Me? Or ?). Again, I admit, I don’t fully understand wrecks, and I’m sure your as “academically unknowalade “ as I am about wrecks……..
stop throwing stones at me, for trying to understand your reasoning. Never once (in this discussion) did I call you names (but I’m close to it)….. ignorance isn’t name calling. Ignorance is something we all possess (And I’m proud of my ignorance, yet willing to become less ignorant)
You’ve yet to show me (us) how wrecks is right?
again, I’ll wait
You didn’t make any “true” statements.
It was all rhetoric, misinformed opinion, and ignorance.