Havenowgone et al -- " I have some faith that the RRECS will result in a fairer way to pay rurals. An independent time study group did the study to get the right times for the things we do. Most rurals should be able to meet or beat the new standards, so I don't think that most of the rurals will lose with this new system....unless you are one that beats their eval by hours each day and week. Then I would worry about the new system. "
-- The thing I'd be worrying about the new system is it depends so much on scanner input, averaging the data collected throughout the year.
-- During a Q & A session:
Q - When you split a route how will that data be credited?
A - Going to depend on how the RCA's scanned. That data would be DROPPED for the day. ( Dwyer )
-- Apparently the USPS and NRLCA is going with quality over quantity.
Q - Why does this not include the 4 weeks around Christmas?
A - I think that the main thought on that and if you base the route on a high volume from just the Christmas season, it is not a true average of the year. ( Mericle )
-- And a 2-weak count during the middle of March is?
-- A true average of the year should include ALL 52 weeks - IMHO.
-- If the system is going to ignore the 4 weeks around Christmas, why is the supposed OT period only 3 weeks and the ARC "peak" period is from 19 NOV 18 to 12 JAN 19?
-- Will the USPS be guaranteeing that scanners will never drop contact as well as batteries never dying while out on the route?
-- Just some ramblings from an outsider.
-- The thing I'd be worrying about the new system is it depends so much on scanner input, averaging the data collected throughout the year.
-- During a Q & A session:
Q - When you split a route how will that data be credited?
A - Going to depend on how the RCA's scanned. That data would be DROPPED for the day. ( Dwyer )
-- Apparently the USPS and NRLCA is going with quality over quantity.
Q - Why does this not include the 4 weeks around Christmas?
A - I think that the main thought on that and if you base the route on a high volume from just the Christmas season, it is not a true average of the year. ( Mericle )
-- And a 2-weak count during the middle of March is?
-- A true average of the year should include ALL 52 weeks - IMHO.
-- If the system is going to ignore the 4 weeks around Christmas, why is the supposed OT period only 3 weeks and the ARC "peak" period is from 19 NOV 18 to 12 JAN 19?
-- Will the USPS be guaranteeing that scanners will never drop contact as well as batteries never dying while out on the route?
-- Just some ramblings from an outsider.
