• Everyone, please help make our jobs easier and choose the correct category. Thank you

How long after mini mail count do we see our new route evaluation?

Isn't this amazing? How is it the engineers didn't realize that routes need to be adjusted from time to time? And how is it the union and USPS manglement haven't been working on just this issue the last couple of years?
Exactly. If they didn't think they needed to be adjusted, why would we have to do this every 6 months.
 
Exactly. If they didn't think they needed to be adjusted, why would we have to do this every 6 months.
Adjustments and periodic evaluation is different thing . Circumstances might change for any route —- Amazon addition , Amazon drop etc etc . Periodic evaluation is needed for that . Adjustment needed for territory gain or loss , squaring up etc . Failure by engineers to keep a process for that is actually mind boggling
 
. I wouldn't mind getting some country...just drive around & jam to music
trust me, it gets old fast….. hearing the same song 20 times a day gets old. Listening to news gets old faster. Listening to talk shows gets boring. Interesting pod casts don’t produce often enough….. and finding interesting pod casts is even harder……
It gets old! FAST!
 
trust me, it gets old fast….. hearing the same song 20 times a day gets old. Listening to news gets old faster. Listening to talk shows gets boring. Interesting pod casts don’t produce often enough….. and finding interesting pod casts is even harder……
It gets old! FAST!
Turn off radio enjoy the sights and sounds around. Like the route I run most days, but I dont necessarily want a suburb route. The GoV vehicle is the huge bonus currently.
 
It basically comes down to whether or not you trust the rrecs system. You obviously don’t, but you refuse to state how many parcels you get on average per day. We have others on this board who have admitted they only work 4 hours per day. It really shouldn’t surprise you that rrecs cut your hours. You need to face reality. You’re not doing 9.6 hours of work to be a 48k.
I’m doing 300 parcels per day.
How can ANYBODY (besides you) TRUST wrecks? No transparency in flats is fair? We should just TRUST it? Coverage factor is FAIR? We should just trust it? Being told “too many unscan parcels“ is fair? We should just trust it?

Your FAIR wrecks system DID square up my routes time (old 43k, new, 47k), 150-200 parcels a day. However, an old traditional mail count would have squared up most routes to begin with, and we wouldn’t have been doing all these “un-neccesary” scans every time we turn around. But instead, no counts since 2018 is what helped many, and hurt many as well. Wrecks didn’t /doesn’t help anybody (but you). Wrecks is nothing but a time wasting JOKE, that nobody can actually prove what we’ve done! There would be even more under time, if we didn’t waste 10-30 seconds per stupid wrecks scans we’ve now got to do.
Yup! Wrecks was fair! Kill 66% instantly, instead of doing counts every year since 2018! Wrecks was fair taking $20,000 from some INSTANTLY!
Wrecks is doing you fair as well, paying you 48 hours a week, when you probably should be getting 60 hours a week! Wrecks is fair! Wrecks did me fair as well, bumped me up 4 hours a week, but I’m sure it should be more, but I can’t verify any information “they” base those 4 hours off of. (I can verify, 30ish boxes (never counted before) helped my 4 hours. I can verify, my 150-200 packages (versus 2018s count of 60-80) helped my 4 hour bump. Wrecks didn’t do that. A traditional mail count YEARLY would have done that….
Oh, and wrecks new standard, 86 ppm dps! Yup, that sure helps us all (well, if your a post office negotiations persona)…..
answer me this……. Other than door delivery’s, WHAT HAS WRECKS DONE IN OUR FAVOR? That a traditional MAIL COUNT wouldn’t have done us?
Please, explain us us “know nothing idiots” you make us out to be, exactly how wrecks does us so good? (Other than to the door packages, which I’m sure many would originally fit in the box)……. And we should trust wrecks WHY? Oh, never mind, Ronny told us that also. “Folks, wrecks will only work, if we trust in it”. Well said Ronny! Well said!
You are just smart enough to understand (in the po eyes), that wrecks is good…. But your so ignorant, that you can’t see beyond your own little bubble in this world, that wrecks is NOT the answer. Wrecks is NOT fair! Nobody (but you) TRUSTS wrecks! (Maybe someday we can/will, but not as it is now)
And ignorance is not name calling, ignorance is not necessarily a bad thing. Everybody on this board, everybody in the world is ignorant, about something. What one does/does not do with ignorance, is another subject. However, in your eyes, everybody’s “ignorance” seems to not matter, to what you believe!
 
Last edited:
Turn off radio enjoy the sights and sounds around. Like the route I run most days, but I dont necessarily want a suburb route. The GoV vehicle is the huge bonus currently.
Yup! I do that as well, but, even that gets old. 91 miles a day, route miles, 20 miles a day round trip to work/home…… even pure silence gets old…. Lol….
I have been enjoying the bears that have been more frequent tho, except the 2 I saw crossing the road 1.5 miles from home….
Initially, I refused the gov vehicle, but wouldn’t have gotten anyways (our office got 1, 3 wanted it, 2 didn’t, 1 came thru, the rest didnt), but after 2 transmissions in 2 vehicles this year (1 still waiting on money to get it), I sure wish I had a metris. ema sure don’t buy a transmission these days!
 
How can ANYBODY (besides you) TRUST wrecks? No transparency in flats is fair? We should just TRUST it? Coverage factor is FAIR? We should just trust it? Being told “too many unscan parcels“ is fair? We should just trust it?

Your FAIR wrecks system DID square up my routes time (old 43k, new, 47k), 150-200 parcels a day. However, an old traditional mail count would have squared up most routes to begin with, and we wouldn’t have been doing all these “un-neccesary” scans every time we turn around. But instead, no counts since 2018 is what helped many, and hurt many as well. Wrecks didn’t /doesn’t help anybody (but you). Wrecks is nothing but a time wasting JOKE, that nobody can actually prove what we’ve done! There would be even more under time, if we didn’t waste 10-30 seconds per stupid wrecks scans we’ve now got to do.
Yup! Wrecks was fair! Kill 66% instantly, instead of doing counts every year since 2018! Wrecks was fair taking $20,000 from some INSTANTLY!
Wrecks is doing you fair as well, paying you 48 hours a week, when you probably should be getting 60 hours a week! Wrecks is fair! Wrecks did me fair as well, bumped me up 4 hours a week, but I’m sure it should be more, but I can’t verify any information “they” base those 4 hours off of. (I can verify, 30ish boxes (never counted before) helped my 4 hours. I can verify, my 150-200 packages (versus 2018s count of 60-80) helped my 4 hour bump. Wrecks didn’t do that. A traditional mail count YEARLY would have done that….
Oh, and wrecks new standard, 86 ppm dps! Yup, that sure helps us all (well, if your a post office negotiations persona)…..
answer me this……. Other than door delivery’s, WHAT HAS WRECKS DONE IN OUR FAVOR? That a traditional MAIL COUNT wouldn’t have done us?
Please, explain us us “know nothing idiots” you make us out to be, exactly how wrecks does us so good? (Other than to the door packages, which I’m sure many would originally fit in the box)……. And we should trust wrecks WHY? Oh, never mind, Ronny told us that also. “Folks, wrecks will only work, if we trust in it”. Well said Ronny! Well said!
You are just smart enough to understand (in the po eyes), that wrecks is good…. But your so ignorant, that you can’t see beyond your own little bubble in this world, that wrecks is NOT the answer. Wrecks is NOT fair! Nobody (but you) TRUSTS wrecks! (Maybe someday we can/will, but not as it is now)
:) 👏😍
 
How can ANYBODY (besides you) TRUST wrecks? No transparency in flats is fair? We should just TRUST it? Coverage factor is FAIR? We should just trust it? Being told “too many unscan parcels“ is fair? We should just trust it?

Your FAIR wrecks system DID square up my routes time (old 43k, new, 47k), 150-200 parcels a day. However, an old traditional mail count would have squared up most routes to begin with, and we wouldn’t have been doing all these “un-neccesary” scans every time we turn around. But instead, no counts since 2018 is what helped many, and hurt many as well. Wrecks didn’t /doesn’t help anybody (but you). Wrecks is nothing but a time wasting JOKE, that nobody can actually prove what we’ve done! There would be even more under time, if we didn’t waste 10-30 seconds per stupid wrecks scans we’ve now got to do.
Yup! Wrecks was fair! Kill 66% instantly, instead of doing counts every year since 2018! Wrecks was fair taking $20,000 from some INSTANTLY!
Wrecks is doing you fair as well, paying you 48 hours a week, when you probably should be getting 60 hours a week! Wrecks is fair! Wrecks did me fair as well, bumped me up 4 hours a week, but I’m sure it should be more, but I can’t verify any information “they” base those 4 hours off of. (I can verify, 30ish boxes (never counted before) helped my 4 hours. I can verify, my 150-200 packages (versus 2018s count of 60-80) helped my 4 hour bump. Wrecks didn’t do that. A traditional mail count YEARLY would have done that….
Oh, and wrecks new standard, 86 ppm dps! Yup, that sure helps us all (well, if your a post office negotiations persona)…..
answer me this……. Other than door delivery’s, WHAT HAS WRECKS DONE IN OUR FAVOR? That a traditional MAIL COUNT wouldn’t have done us?
Please, explain us us “know nothing idiots” you make us out to be, exactly how wrecks does us so good? (Other than to the door packages, which I’m sure many would originally fit in the box)……. And we should trust wrecks WHY? Oh, never mind, Ronny told us that also. “Folks, wrecks will only work, if we trust in it”. Well said Ronny! Well said!
You are just smart enough to understand (in the po eyes), that wrecks is good…. But your so ignorant, that you can’t see beyond your own little bubble in this world, that wrecks is NOT the answer. Wrecks is NOT fair! Nobody (but you) TRUSTS wrecks! (Maybe someday we can/will, but not as it is now)
And ignorance is not name calling, ignorance is not necessarily a bad thing. Everybody on this board, everybody in the world is ignorant, about something. What one does/does not do with ignorance, is another subject. However, in your eyes, everybody’s “ignorance” seems to not matter, to what you believe!
You’re speaking from the depths of your ignorance.
There is so much to refute I don’t know where to start.
First, overburdened routes will be cut per contract language, this has nothing to do with rrecs and it’s always been this way. You can’t blame rrecs for me doing 68 hours of work and getting paid 48.
Parcels: we used to get half of our parcels counted as flats and now they’re all considered parcels, huge win.
We get all the mail and parcels from peak season counted and for the entire year not just a 2 week manipulated window.
Why can’t you just count your flats everyday and average the number and compare it to the 4241m? Or is that too complicated for you to figure out?
86ppm is for looking at the address not casing letters.
All you did was a bunch of angry name calling and you made confused misinformed statements.
 
Rrecs increased my route 5 hours more than all the counts combined in the last 6 years I think the 2 minutes a parcel was a huge win,riding the 48k gravy train finished at 2 oclock today feels like i'm stealing.
 
Last edited:
You’re speaking from the depths of your ignorance.
There is so much to refute I don’t know where to start.
First, overburdened routes will be cut per contract language, this has nothing to do with rrecs and it’s always been this way. You can’t blame rrecs for me doing 68 hours of work and getting paid 48.
Parcels: we used to get half of our parcels counted as flats and now they’re all considered parcels, huge win.
We get all the mail and parcels from peak season counted and for the entire year not just a 2 week manipulated window.
Why can’t you just count your flats everyday and average the number and compare it to the 4241m? Or is that too complicated for you to figure out?
86ppm is for looking at the address not casing letters.
All you did was a bunch of angry name calling and you made confused misinformed statements.
Fair enuf. You DID FINALLY, make a couple fair points. But, there’s many more unfair points in wrecks, that you keep overlooking, more than your good points. (Yes, I am ignorant, on many things, however, I’m not ashamed about it, I can dig deeper if you’d like),
Why should I have to count my flats? (Yes, I am to lazy to) I’m not paid to count my flats! I’m trusting this BULLCHIT system, ONLY because, I’m a 47k, hoping to not get cut, I’m actually not doing things to lower my standards, to come down to 45ish, hoping to not be cut.
I don’t blame wrecks for your 68 for 48 hours pay! But I do blame people like you praising wrecks for your 68 for 48!!! Wrecks din NOT do that for you. Yes, it helped you, some, but if you’d open your eyes, your 68 for 48 is probably more than 68, yet your happy with it! Good on you! Be happy being under paid!
some of us, on here, and elsewhere, are NOT SO ignorant, that we realize, wrecks kills us, more than it helps us! But, you can’t grasp that fact, so just stop demoralizing those of us that aren’t that ignorant.
You did make a couple good points on wrecks. But everything else wrecks wise, only kills us (you as well, if you’d only wake up)
 
You didn’t make any “true” statements.
It was all rhetoric, misinformed opinion, and ignorance.
Tell us, what was untrue? Inform this ignorant idiot, how anything I said was untrue, misinformed opinion, or ignorant? (Yes, I am ignorant, and proud of it. At least I’m willing to become “less” ignorant)
 
Back
Top