Sweet! You got a picture of me ??
Unless it coincides with other changes that eliminates the need for a vast army of relief carriers.
Staffing in most crafts are already short, with hiring not happening why would they do something like that! If they had young less expensive employees waiting in the wings than maybe it would make sense!
There are already not enough bodies to run routes on some days.I noticed the article said "a management hiring freeze".
I guess this could be interpreted that the hiring freeze does not applying to the people that actually do the work of handling mail. That would make sense, as hiring would have to occur if lots of carriers took early retirement. There simply would not be enough bodies to run routes.
Agreed. As much as I would love to see it happen for personal reasons, I will be shocked if it does. I found this on the OPM site:I noticed the article said "a management hiring freeze".
I guess this could be interpreted that the hiring freeze does not applying to the people that actually do the work of handling mail. That would make sense, as hiring would have to occur if lots of carriers took early retirement. There simply would not be enough bodies to run routes.
there was a bill floating earlier called (I think) “the federal retiree retirement fairness act”, that would allow part time employees to buy back their time, but it died somewhere. Maybe it will rise up again, although I’m nervous about any bill in congress using the word fairness.The only way the machine would work with rural craft is if the off chance that Congress actually does some good for workers and let rural s buy Back the wasted years RCAing. If it would claw back some bonus cash it would happen quickly. So one never knows what's coming down the pipe. Except the one sitting on the sh*tter .they know.
To boot that I think we all should be able to retire at 55.They need to change the eligibility to 20 years. Our bodies can't take 30 years under these conditions.
If I follow, to have a VERA as suggested on the table there needs to be a major change we do not know about coming up. For example: Temporary workers becoming a larger part of the work force through some type of emergency measure.Unless your agency needs to eliminate all positions in the agency or a component, a general “blanket” VERA and/or VSIP is not permissible
That was along the lines that I was thinking also! Dejoy's going to ride the dead wood hard so why not give them more incentive to leave by offering them an early out!I predict there will be a Vera offered....for upper management types to move them off of the payroll. Craft will NOT be included.
Just for the quality years. I'm sure lots would volunteer when requested. Good thoughts gerl2To boot that I think we all should be able to retire at 55.
A bill like it is constantly floated, then dies somewhere. Happens year after year, with maybe a year or two off. I've stopped getting my hopes up.there was a bill floating earlier called (I think) “the federal retiree retirement fairness act”, that would allow part time employees to buy back their time, but it died somewhere. Maybe it will rise up again, although I’m nervous about any bill in congress using the word fairness.
I understand much of our district dead-wood cleared out on the retirement train after the new PMG was installed. (PM says that's why we can't get timely edit book processing.)I predict there will be a Vera offered....for upper management types to move them off of the payroll. Craft will NOT be included.
A bill like it is constantly floated, then dies somewhere. Happens year after year, with maybe a year or two off. I've stopped getting my hopes up.
I understand much of our district dead-wood cleared out on the retirement train after the new PMG was installed. (PM says that's why we can't get timely edit book processing.)
The carrier who trained me decades ago told me to never expect the rurals to be included in any VERA. At that time clerks and city carriers were offered one with time and cash incentives.
Thank you.Your pm saying retirements is reason your edit books are not done in a timely manner sounds like a bunch of BS. The ppl who do the edit books (IMO) are not high enough on the mgt chain to be effected by new PMG !
That's bc they've never done the jobI get the impression that the big shots look at the accounting but don't really understand the business enough to know what it means.